Posts Tagged Christ

The Historical Resurrection of the Christ

The Historical Resurrection of the Christ.mp3

The cross is either the liberation of mankind or its subjugation. The call of the Nazarene “come, and I will give you rest”, is either the call of a Savior or a Charlatan. The scandal of the cross is that the answer lies in history not merely in orthodoxy, in the objective, not merely in the subjective, and in precedent not merely in consequent; and the answer to the call is either fulfilled or emptied on that Sunday that is called Good. The cries of the heart covet for the theology at Golgotha to be true but intentions contradict desire. We want to have our longings satisfied but we also want our autonomy and it is the latter conceit that chastises the former hope. Wherein this lays our highest longing, the vessel where the longing is placed is its weakest member. – T.H. Moller

If men could learn from history, what lessons it might teach us! But passion and party blind our eyes, and the light which experience gives is a lantern on the stern, which shines only on the waves behind us! – Samuel Taylor Coleridge

I. Historical

A) Burial of Jesus Christ
“The best established fact of the passion story.” J.A.T. Robinson
1) Buried in Joseph of Arimathea’s personal tomb. Best established fact of the story according to most NT scholars.
2) A Sanhedrin member. The very council that condemned Jesus.
3) Multiple Attestation: More than one source mentions an event.
a. 1 Cor 15
b. Mark 15
4) No other independent burial stories and therefore no competing burial stories.

B) Tomb was Empty
1) Tomb was found empty by women. Women had zero legal credibility at the time.
2) Earliest Jewish polemic presupposed an empty tomb saying the disciples came and stole the body.
3) Early Attestation to both the burial and empty tomb found 1 Cor. 15
i. The words delivered and received are terms descriptive of rabbinic treatment of holy tradition, indicating that this is holy tradition received by Paul.
ii. Several primitive, early, pre-Paulint phrases are used (“the twelve,”, “the third day,” “he was seen”, “for our sins” [ plural ], “he was raised”). These phrases are very Jewish and early.
iii. The poetic style is Hebraic
iv. The Aramaic Cephas is used; this was an early way of referring to Peter.
v. “He was buried” implies the empty tomb and stands between the death and resurrection.
vi. There are four “that” clauses which mirror Mark’s general chronological narrative. The burial anticipates the empty tomb in this formula.
vii. “The third day” points to an empty tomb but since Paul did not actually see the resurrection how did he date it on the third day? Craig argues that the women found the tomb empty which dates the resurrection on the third day.
From J.P. Moreland, Scaling the Secular City, p.150 and W. L. Craig The Son also Rises.

C) Groups of people witnessed the appearances. Multiple attestation to the appearances.
Appeared to believers and non-believers alike.
1) 1 Cor 15 again shows that these reports are early
2) The reports are brief and sporadic and sometimes difficult to harmonize.
3) Disciples were slow to believe which casts a negative light on the first leaders of the church. This would be counterproductive to establish their leadership and authority.
4) The reports are reported with characteristic reserve. Compare with the gnostic Gospel of Peter which reports on the resurrection itself as a cross coming out of the tomb and Jesus standing so tall is head disappears into the clouds, although not green resembling a Jolly Green Giant standing above lilliputian Jerusalem.
“In light of these facts, the Gospel story is psychologically sound. The disciples were slow to recognize in Jesus as their Messiah, for by his actions he was fulfilling none of the roles expected for the Messiah.” George E. Ladd, I believe in the Resurrection, pp. 71-72
”It is historically certain that Peter and the other disciples had experiences, after Jesus’ death, in which Jesus appeared to them as the risen Christ.” Gerhard Luddeman
“The more we study the tradition with regard to the appearances, the firmer the rock begins to appear upon which they are based.” Norman Perrin, The Resurrection according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke, p. 80

D) The Origin of the Christian Church: The earliest disciples came to believe that Jesus was risen from the dead despite every predisposition to the contrary!
1) Their leader was dead and there was no Jewish tradition of a dead messiah.
2) Under Jewish Law, a person executed by crucifixion was cursed by God, a person shown to be a heretic.
3) The Jewish belief and hope had no hope or expectation of anyone rising from the dead before the general resurrection at the end of the world but the disciples came to believe that Jesus rose from the dead. They went to their deaths for that belief.
”We have here a belief that nothing in terms of antecedent historical influences
can account for apart from the resurrection itself.” C.F.D. Moule

E) The changed lives of the disciples, including Paul. If one denies the resurrection of Christ then one has to posit an X to explain the origin of the Christian church, and that X has to be big enough to account for the changed lives of the disciples.
1) According to Eusebius, and indirectly corroborated by Josephus, all the disciples, with the exception of John were killed for their belief in the resurrected Christ.
2) Saul was a Pharisee intent on destroying the “cult of The Way”. But Saul who became Paul witnessed the risen Christ, and changed his message and approach as a result.
Acts 9
Gal 1:11-17
Acts 26:9-18
Phil 3:4-6

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

A Response to The New Perspective of Paul (NPP)

apostle-paul

The New Perspective of Paul (NPP):
A scholarly re-interpretation of Paul’s thought concerning justification by faith which has been held by Protestants since the reformation. The new interpretation is that justification is not a legal status of one’s standing before God but rather filial declaration by God that Jesus is the messiah of God’s people.

Main Points of NPP:
- Judaism was a religion of grace and inclusivism rather exclusivistic communal competition and striving for individual righteousness with God.
- Law was not something one used to earn favor with God but was merely a Jew’s identity mark as being a people of God.
- Jews boasting that they were elect/favored/chosen was the main problem Paul is addressing in Romans.
- Justification does not have to do with one’s standing before God but one’s identity with a people group of God.
- Jesus does not satisfy the wrath of God and then transfer that acquired righteousness to us.
- A person does not need to individually put faith in Jesus but just realize God accepts them as they are and join the community of God.

Main Proponents of NPP:
- Dr. James D.G. Dunn
- Dr. E.P. Sanders
- Dr. N.T. Wright

My Contentions:
- Judaism was clearly one of exclusivism and religious competition both according to Jesus and Paul and this is not eisogesis (Mat 5:17-20, Phil 3:4-8 ). Notice Jesus distinction of the individual ["whoever" vs. "others" and what they are called] and notice Paul’s use of “I” and “myself.”
- “Law” is used in three different ways in Romans. To minimalize these contextual and exegetical observations and to reduce them to merely being a “boundary marker” is to do violence to the text.

- The main problem Paul is addressing in Romans is sin, idolatry deep in mankind’s heart, not boasting (Rom 1:18-:24).
- A thorough study of the Greek word, dikaisune clearly shows that righteousness is not merely communal identity. Here is a link to my work on the diakio word group in Romans 1-8: dikaiosune.pdf
- A study of the word “propitation” in Rom 3:25 and a study of the word “counts” in Rom 4:23-24 clearly teach the imputed righteousness of Christ. Here are links to my work dealing with these passages: propitiation.pdf and imputation.pdf
- Propenents of NPP utilize a form of “chronological snobbery” as C.S. Lewis once described it. Basically this means they caricaturize the classical reformed view of
justication by faith as being primitive and scholastically unwarranted and that if one was to believe this “new” theory, only then could they claim intellectual warrant.
- I believe NPP is self-refuting in its charges against cultural eisogesis. NPP reeks of the postmodern virtue of pluralistic inclusivism and is not the result of solid exegesis but rather the attempt to force Paul and Romans into a postmodern framework.
- I believe that NPP is dangerous and is heresy because it eliminates not only the Jew’s need for Jesus but as a result all other’s need. Faith is not merely a realization of what you already are. This is a serious conflagration between the doctrines of justification and sanctification.
- An acceptance of this doctrine will set the church back to a pre-reformation setting and the gospel will be lost. As Martin Luther said, “justification by faith” is the doctrine upon which the church stands or falls.

Below is a brief bibliography on the subject:

In favor of NPP:
_ James Dunn, Jesus, Paul, and the Law: Studies in Mark and Galatians.
(Louisville:Westminster/John Knox, 1990) ISBN 0664250955
_ E.P. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism. (Fortress, 1977) ISBN 0800618998
_ N.T. Wright, What Saint Paul Really Said: Was Paul of Tarsus the Real Founder of
Christianity?. (Eerdmans, 1997) ISBN 0802844456

Refuting NPP:

_ D.A. Carson, Peter O’Brien, and Mark Seifrid (eds.), Justification And Variegated Nomism. 2 volumes (Baker Academic, 2001 & 2004) vol. 1 – ISBN 080102272X / vol. 2 – ISBN 0801027411
_ Piper, John. The Future of Justification: A Response to N.T. Wright. (Crossway, 2007) ISBN 9781581349641

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

What is Sin?

Forbidden Fruit

A while back, you may recall that the Vatican announced several new sins. But it seems to me, there’s no such thing as new sins. In fact, there are basically three types of sin which manifest themselves in various forms.

What is…sin’s essence? Playing God…acting as if you, and your pleasure, were the end to which all things, God included, must be made to function as a means. – J.I. Packer

Avah – often translated “iniquity” means to be twisted out of shape. (Ps 51:2). Tim Keller described it this way; Just as a when a bone is dislocated from it’s socket it causes great pain and damage, so a heart not centered on God is filled with deeply distorted beliefs. If you are out of alignment with God’s will, then you most likely aren’t even aware of your sin. Avah violates God’s design.

At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures…hated and hating. (Titus 3:3)

Chatha – often translated “sin” means to miss the mark or target. But it’s more than missing the target, it’s to fall short so completely. Like throwing a rock at the moon will “fall short” so too our own efforts to live as God wants fall short. “Sin” is the failure to live as God wants, in peaceful harmony with Him, others and the world. If we fail to understand this, we risk becoming legalistic, thinking that we can be sin-less by not violating the “rules”. Chatha violates God’s peace.

All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. (Rom. 3:23)

Pasha – often translated “transgression” means to willfully rebel against someone to whom you owe allegiance. (Ps 51:1, Isa 1:2). Our disobedience to God is a deliberate substitution of our will for His. Pasha violates God’s authority.

For though they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks…they exchanged the glory of the immortal God and worshiped and served created things rather than the creator (Rom 1:21-25)

Avah shows us how deep our sin is and Chatha shows us how high God’s standards are, but Pasha shows us how we are still responsible for our sin and that we must still strive to meet God’s expectations for us. And even though we can’t achieve perfection, we can be sanctified through the effort. Repentance and God’s grace make it possible for us to grow in Christ, thus not dwelling in our misery and sin.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE